The Martin Bryant Conspiracy

The key to gun control in Australia.
On the 28th April 1996, an unknown marksman opened fire on diners in the Broad Arrow Cafe at Port Arthur in Australia. In less than 20 minutes at this and five other crime scenes, the marksman killed 35, injured 22, and crippled two cars with only 64 shots. Nineteen of the first twenty dead in the Broad Arrow Cafe died from single shots to the head, all fired by the unknown marksman from his right hip. This staggering display of marksman- ship was blamed on left-handed and intellectually impaired Martin Bryant, whose shooting experience extended to popping off cans in the bush, and had no military training of any kind.There is something strangely suspicious about this whole incident. If you take the time to read all the accounts of this and the events leading up to and after this catasphrope, you will see it quite clearly.
Gun control in Australia was a very hot subject at this time, and then, suspiciously enough, tough uniform gun laws were initiated immediately after this massacre and the Australian public accepted it with open arms. The gun lobby was vocal in it’s opposition but very little could be done to quell the euphoria created by the media, the Government and by the massacre which now looks very much like a setup intended for this very purpose.

A few key points:
The much maligned Martin Bryant, allegedly the Port Arthur gunman has never had a fair trial, has never had a proper investigation of the circumstances and in fact was convicted without evidence proving beyond a reasonable doubt.
Cases of this type are invariably trial by jury, but in the case of Martin Bryant there was no trial — only a sentencing hearing conducted by Chief Justice Cox and prosecuted by Chief Prosecutor Damian Bugg QC. In itself, these circumstances demand a lot of answers, not the least being — no trial, yet a Chief Prosecutor?
Source - http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/palies10.htm

WITNESS
Of all the witnesses that saw the shooter, only one knew Martin Bryant from before.That was Jim Laycock, the former owner of the Broad Arrow Café.He not only knew Bryant, but also where he used sit in the Broad Arrow and what he used to drink and the conversations he used to have with his daughter.So what did Laycock say about his identification of the shooter? “I did not recognize the male (shooter) as Martin Bryant”.
Wouldn’t it be interesting to hear that evidence in court!Imagine the only person who knew Bryant from before the massacre saying that he didn’t recognize the shooter as Bryant.Of course, we will never get to hear that evidence, not only because the government will never have an inquiry, but more importantly because Mr. Laycock is now deceased.Reminds me of so many of the key witnesses around the Kennedy assassination ending up being deceased, perhaps this is just one more of those unusual coincidences between the Port Arthur Massacre and JFK.
Source - http://www.alphalink.com.au/~noelmcd/portarth/JFKandPA.htm

The Rifle
On June 23 1996 almost one month after the Port Arthur massacre a Queensland newspaper published a front page story about a Victorian gun collector who believed in his heart that he had once owned the rifle used in the Tasmanian massacre.
Mr. Drysdale, a member of an old and respected farming family told Victorian police and a senior member of the Tasmanian Police Port Arthur Taskforce, Inspector John Maxwell, that he was convinced that the rifle he had handed in at a previous amnesty was identical to that used in the massacre. His rifle had been valued by police and they gave him $1700 compensation.
He told police that a mark on the barrel of the Port Arthur weapon described to him by Inspector Maxwell, matched a mark on his rifle made by his gunsmith.
“My rifle also had a collapsible stock and a Colt sight, just as the massacre weapon has,” he said.
“I did the right thing and handed the weapon in and if the police put it back into the Australian community I would be disgusted.

“They told me it would be sent overseas and used for military purposes.”
A spokesman for one of Australia’s largest firearms importers said that the firearms matching the Port Arthur weapon were as “scarce as hen’s teeth” and the chances of two identical weapons with almost identical serial numbers being imported were “next to nothing”.

Police dismissed Mr Drysdales’s claims saying that although the serial number of his weapon is close to that of the Port Arthur rifle and the descriptions match, their records show that his rifle was destroyed on March 9 1994, 14 months after it was surrendered to police at Yea.
However senior Victorian police admitted that police did not keep records of the dates on which particular firearms were destroyed.

A shaken Mr Drysdale said that Victorian police had ordered him not to speak to the media.
“They instructed me to say nothing about my gun or this meeting until they released details of an internal police investigation”, he said.
Victorian Assistant Police Commissioner Graham Sinclair insisted that Mr Drysdale’s rifle had been destroyed.

A spokesman said, “Our records show that it was destroyed in April 1994″. However minutes from a confidential police district commanders conference on June 11 stated that police were concerned that not all weapons sent to Simsmetal for destruction were actually destroyed.
The minutes stated that “The situation with destruction is that FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) books a day at Simsmetal and the weapons are taken away on a conveyor belt to the breaking machine”.

“The problem with this includes the weapons falling off the conveyor belt, leaving the sight of police before destruction and that the firearms are destroyed by a third party.”
On June 16 Mr Sinclair admitted that police had sold a number of surrendered AR15 rifles to a Bendigo arms dealer.

Despite the footage shown on television of guns being destroyed before the eyes of their owners many collectors who handed their guns in by order after the Port Arthur massacre said that they did not see them destroyed as promised.
Source - http://home.overflow.net.au/~nedwood/story.html

The Bryant Look-a-like
The shooting and massacre at Port Arthur Historic Site started moments after a man with long blond hair walked into the Broad Arrow Cafe carrying either 1 or 2 sports bags. One of those bags contained personal effects of Martin Bryant - including his bulky video camera. The question must be asked why would Bryant take those things into the cafe if he planned a massacre, or was it someone else trying to incriminate him ?
Photographic analysis of the gunman who was filmed in the carpark after he left the cafe proves it was not Martin Bryant but someone else wearing a wig made up to look like Martin Bryant.

The Morgue Truck
One of the strangest co-incidences about the Port Arthur incident is the fact the Tasmanian authorities had at their disposal a special refrigerated morgue truck capable of carrying 22 bodies. ( A picture of this truck is below ).
Why this is strange derives from 4 facts. The State of Tasmania had prior to the incident on average 6 murders per year - and they did not all occur on the same day, place or time - that works out to one murder every 2 months - so why would such a truck be needed ? No other State in Australia had one like it. These facts are compounded by the fact the truck was acquired and specially built shortly before ( June 1995 ) the Port Arthur massacre and sold 2 years later ( see fax copy of advertisement offering for sale below ) .
The Coroner in his initial report ( see copy below ) mentions this morgue truck and says how timely it was having one like this available calling it a “highly prized possession”.
Was it built especially for the massacre to control access to the bodies from the Broad Arrow Cafe ? .

Why was this truck, acquired at great expense, sold ? Had its use been fulfilled and they knew it would never be needed again ?
Also isn’t it a strange co-incidence the number of dead in the Broad Arrow Cafe closely matches the capacity of this morgue truck ?
And why did Tasmanian Police usher away media reporters from this truck on the day
Source - http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/snpamorgtruck.html

The Work Seminar
One of the most convenient things about Sunday 28th April 1996 at the Port Arthur Historic Site is the fact senior staff of the site were sent on a Work Seminar 2 hours drive to the mainland. The staff circular flyer notifying staff is below.
What is strange about this is the fact it is the only one ever held and there have been none since. In addition it was to be held on a Sunday, not a weekday - and was not held in the area but on the mainland 2 hours drive away at Swansea.
What strikes you about this notice is the flowery almost nonsensical purpose of this seminar - woffle like. Additionally the notice says this is part of a series of workshops - but why were no more held ?

Also the time for this Workshop to start was around lunchtime - 1pm - the time when the shootings started in the Broad Arrow Cafe. Another co-incidence ? Observation - that would be the time of day when the site and Cafe was at its fullest.
Was the purpose of this seminar to get senior staff out of the area for that time of day so their skill and knowledge could not interfere with the gunman’s rampage and also to ensure they did not come to harm ?
If so how could Martin Bryant have arranged this ?
Source - http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/snpaworksem.html

April 28 1996 - What Really Happened ?
The planning for the Port Arthur massacre had been in full swing as of mid 1995 and partially culminated in shooters groups being softened up in November 1995 when firearm proposals were announced. These proposals emanated from the Federal Justice Department in Canberra and it should be remembered the Australian Labor Party were the Government at that time.
In the days and weeks prior to 28 April 1996 Martin Bryant had been recruited by the small handful Tasmanian Police in the know about the planned massacre to help them with what he was told was a mock operation ( this followed his failure to pass firearms proficiency tests ) and was given the script for the Sunday and had photos taken on Friday 25 April ( the photos that would appear later ). Bryant had been told to buy 2 Prince sports bags and did so that day. Communications equipment was requisitioned from a government installation in Victoria and taken to Tasman Peninsula.
Source - http://www.shootersnews.addr.com/snpa280496.htm